Join Britain's fastest-growing independent political community which provides more than 90,000 readers with counter-cultural evidence, analysis, and debate that challenges the establishment.
The strongest point here isn’t even the booklet itself, it’s the contradiction.
If the Government believes there’s genuinely nothing to see in the immigration/crime data, release the data and let the public judge for themselves.
You can’t simultaneously say “there’s no problem”, refuse to publish the evidence, and then issue guidance warning new arrivals not to rape, sexually assault, abuse or harass people.
Transparency would settle the argument. Why won’t they provide it?
What nonsense. Of course the uniparty can say there is no problem and refuse to release the data. In the same way, it can say, straightfaced, that a woman can have a penis. Come on, you have to get with the programme. Norfolk and Suffolk Constabulary is now issuing certain officers with male and female warrant cards so that their 'gender' is covered dependent upon mood.
Because of positive discrimination, we now have police officers who cannot decide if they are male or female on any given day. More to the point, the police are there to uphold the law. Except of course that of the Supreme Court which has ruled that one's gender is permanent and cannot be changed. Does that mean I can speed along the A12 if I am in a risk taking mood? It should do.
Of course they can do it. They plainly are doing it. My point is that they cannot do it credibly or without contradicting themselves.
They insist there is no problem, withhold the evidence that would allow the public to test that claim, and simultaneously issue guidance suggesting that there is a sufficiently serious cultural problem to require explicit warnings about rape, child sexual abuse and controlling women.
Your warrant-card example is another argument about institutional credibility, but it doesn’t alter my central point: publish the immigration and crime data and let the evidence decide the question.
I totally agree. Josef Goebbels once promoted the big lie. For a while, it was very successful. Eventually, though, people acknowledge the evidence in front of their eyes. If the uniparty lies often enough, which goodness knows it has over the years, people stop believing anything it says. For a long time now, if the government advises something, I do the exact opposite. The Covid jab is an excellent case in point.
The Covid jab has probably been the lie of the century Kevan. My father-in-law had an episode after the jab from which he never recovered. I also know of countless people who were injured or who have passed as a result of it. Sadly, very few are acknowledged in the data and that is only the data they will let us have access to.
Which is why I tend to ignore government advice. I refused the jab because it was rushed out in the first place and then the interval between jabs increased 8 fold, from 3 weeks to 6 months. The vaccine had barely been in existence that long, so could not possible have been properly tested.
Meanwhile, government was firing public employees refusing the jab. That is a gross abuse of public power. Equally, experiments with puberty blockers continue, despite them being outlawed. Dr Josef Mengele would be proud of us.
And the Labour Party published this on my wife, having no doubt fished somehow through Facebook posts going back 5 years where she simply stated this fact. Her personal Facebook is pretty heavily locked down as well. https://act.labour.org.uk/p/reform-revealed-dossier
She must have used her maiden name because I could not find her name on the list. The Liebour message is clear enough though. Some Reformers have said some pointlessly unpleasant things and should be censured. The vast majority simply tell it like it is, myself included. I stood in Fareham and Waterlooville in 2024.
Are we allowed to say that the cultural difference expressed in the Koran is at the root of all the problems? Why does no-one ever talk about what is being preached in mosques up and down the country? Where they say that everyone who is not a Muslim is an enemy? And that non-Muslims can be treated as slaves?
When you say not every illegal migrant is a criminal is missing the point. Every illegal migrant should be treated as a criminal and a sexual predator and the onus should be on them to prove otherwise. And that is a prerequisite before they are even considered for asylum. We don’t owe these people anything, we didn’t ask them to come and the majority don’t want them here. It is why the only real solution is detain, deport back to their own country or a third country. We all know sexual attacks are in the hundreds and increasing. The risk of giving any illegal migrant the benefit of doubt is now too great especially for females and children.
The gaslighting is of a monumental scale; we all know the truth. There is not a day goes by without a media report of another white, British woman being subjected to a viscious attack by illegal immigrants, yet the Government still encourages these animals to come here. There is not a day goes by without another report of violence committed by immigrants, whether it be knifings, gang fights or other barbaric assaults, yet we are told that these people are doctors and engineers, but now the cat is out of the bag; by printing this leaflet the Government has admitted that illegal immigrants have unleashed a crime wave onto the British people.
What really angers me is the sentence that states that if an illegal immigrant carries out a rape, then it MAY lead to their asylum claim being refused! If ever there was a sentence designed to encourage attacks then this is it; our own Government telling these animals that when they carry out an assault, it might affect their right to stay in this country, when in fact it should state that they will be on the first plane out of here! We are governed by total traitors and Quislings, and the sooner we get ridnofnthenlot of them the better.
There's this huge brick wall called Reality. The international establishment elites have slammed the accelerator to the floor and they are heading towards it, apparently with their eyes closed. I don't like the idea of a load of terrible destructive crashes. I'd much rather they slowed down, opened their eyes, learned how to think, got out of the car, and walked towards the wall instead. Some hope, huh?
For those who read the Sunday Times, Matthew Syed was basically advising Labour that the fight is lost and they need to start taking action against illegal migration or suffer electoral annihilation (he didn't say the latter but it is there by implication).
His key point is "Are politicians like Mahmood so blind that they can’t see that if illegal migrants need such instructions [in the leaflets], it is rank betrayal of the British people not to instantly deport them?"
Denmark published figures showing the disproportionately high crime rate for Afghans, Somalis etc. It is reasonable to assume that the Afghans etc imported to the UK are also disproportionately criminal. That is, the government needs to explain how the UK somehow got the law abiding Somalis etc only.
By not publishing data the government merely stops us knowing whether our data shows marginally higher or lower disproportion compared to Denmark, and the differences will be marginal and so irrelevant.
It’s for asylum seekers who the govt has to accept once here as they have a right to claim asylum. It is far more worrying that the last govt issued 1 million visas to people to come here without any concern about the beliefs or culture of their countries or their personal conduct. That was just after leaving the EU in order to “get control” of our borders. All of them able to bring in multiple family membets all of whom can vote and can stand for election as far as I understand it . We have an MSP in Scotland who is here only on a temporary student visa yet is in our parliament telling us what rape is and telling women to pipe down.
I’d say the 70% of voters who won’t vote Reform or Restore ARE stupid Matt. And the 4% who insist on voting Restore are very stupid because they won’t vote for the party that could win an election and will give them 80% of what they want. The majority of British people are very stupid or happy seeing the country destroyed.
Agree with a lot there. I'd just add, millions of our own people who live in post industrial wastelands are on welfare and fear the Right will just take their benefits off them and offer no real solutions unfortunately.
If people don't hear a positive economic message or don't believe the Right can deliver on their strengths (Remigration, law and order ect) they will just vote for the candidate promising the most free stuff, unfortunately.
Spot on Matt! They must really think we are stupid. The fact is they are stupid: if they knew anything about human behaviour they would know that it is not changed by a booklet. The British culture and behaviours are rooted in Christian traditions, values and established in the rule of law and all this has evolved over many centuries. Sometimes we don’t value what we have until we start to see it being destroyed. The facilitation of mass migration over a relatively short period of time from vastly different cultures as well as illegal immigration is a threat to our way of life. Enough.
Such pamphlets are not new. Sweden not only put out leaflets but ran classes for illegals on how to behave. Sweden is now clamping down on illegals and trying to get rid of them, an extraordinarily difficult task given they have no papers.
Anybody arriving here illegally must be interned upon arrival. A WW2 style prison camp would do the trick. We are morally obliged to shelter and feed them. Marquees, bunk beds and a diet of turnips and swedes does just that. There they stay until deportation or death, whichever comes first. Odds on it will be death.
The strongest point here isn’t even the booklet itself, it’s the contradiction.
If the Government believes there’s genuinely nothing to see in the immigration/crime data, release the data and let the public judge for themselves.
You can’t simultaneously say “there’s no problem”, refuse to publish the evidence, and then issue guidance warning new arrivals not to rape, sexually assault, abuse or harass people.
Transparency would settle the argument. Why won’t they provide it?
What nonsense. Of course the uniparty can say there is no problem and refuse to release the data. In the same way, it can say, straightfaced, that a woman can have a penis. Come on, you have to get with the programme. Norfolk and Suffolk Constabulary is now issuing certain officers with male and female warrant cards so that their 'gender' is covered dependent upon mood.
Because of positive discrimination, we now have police officers who cannot decide if they are male or female on any given day. More to the point, the police are there to uphold the law. Except of course that of the Supreme Court which has ruled that one's gender is permanent and cannot be changed. Does that mean I can speed along the A12 if I am in a risk taking mood? It should do.
Of course they can do it. They plainly are doing it. My point is that they cannot do it credibly or without contradicting themselves.
They insist there is no problem, withhold the evidence that would allow the public to test that claim, and simultaneously issue guidance suggesting that there is a sufficiently serious cultural problem to require explicit warnings about rape, child sexual abuse and controlling women.
Your warrant-card example is another argument about institutional credibility, but it doesn’t alter my central point: publish the immigration and crime data and let the evidence decide the question.
I totally agree. Josef Goebbels once promoted the big lie. For a while, it was very successful. Eventually, though, people acknowledge the evidence in front of their eyes. If the uniparty lies often enough, which goodness knows it has over the years, people stop believing anything it says. For a long time now, if the government advises something, I do the exact opposite. The Covid jab is an excellent case in point.
The Covid jab has probably been the lie of the century Kevan. My father-in-law had an episode after the jab from which he never recovered. I also know of countless people who were injured or who have passed as a result of it. Sadly, very few are acknowledged in the data and that is only the data they will let us have access to.
Which is why I tend to ignore government advice. I refused the jab because it was rushed out in the first place and then the interval between jabs increased 8 fold, from 3 weeks to 6 months. The vaccine had barely been in existence that long, so could not possible have been properly tested.
Meanwhile, government was firing public employees refusing the jab. That is a gross abuse of public power. Equally, experiments with puberty blockers continue, despite them being outlawed. Dr Josef Mengele would be proud of us.
And the Labour Party published this on my wife, having no doubt fished somehow through Facebook posts going back 5 years where she simply stated this fact. Her personal Facebook is pretty heavily locked down as well. https://act.labour.org.uk/p/reform-revealed-dossier
She must have used her maiden name because I could not find her name on the list. The Liebour message is clear enough though. Some Reformers have said some pointlessly unpleasant things and should be censured. The vast majority simply tell it like it is, myself included. I stood in Fareham and Waterlooville in 2024.
Elizabeth Clark top right
Are we allowed to say that the cultural difference expressed in the Koran is at the root of all the problems? Why does no-one ever talk about what is being preached in mosques up and down the country? Where they say that everyone who is not a Muslim is an enemy? And that non-Muslims can be treated as slaves?
When you say not every illegal migrant is a criminal is missing the point. Every illegal migrant should be treated as a criminal and a sexual predator and the onus should be on them to prove otherwise. And that is a prerequisite before they are even considered for asylum. We don’t owe these people anything, we didn’t ask them to come and the majority don’t want them here. It is why the only real solution is detain, deport back to their own country or a third country. We all know sexual attacks are in the hundreds and increasing. The risk of giving any illegal migrant the benefit of doubt is now too great especially for females and children.
The gaslighting is of a monumental scale; we all know the truth. There is not a day goes by without a media report of another white, British woman being subjected to a viscious attack by illegal immigrants, yet the Government still encourages these animals to come here. There is not a day goes by without another report of violence committed by immigrants, whether it be knifings, gang fights or other barbaric assaults, yet we are told that these people are doctors and engineers, but now the cat is out of the bag; by printing this leaflet the Government has admitted that illegal immigrants have unleashed a crime wave onto the British people.
What really angers me is the sentence that states that if an illegal immigrant carries out a rape, then it MAY lead to their asylum claim being refused! If ever there was a sentence designed to encourage attacks then this is it; our own Government telling these animals that when they carry out an assault, it might affect their right to stay in this country, when in fact it should state that they will be on the first plane out of here! We are governed by total traitors and Quislings, and the sooner we get ridnofnthenlot of them the better.
There's this huge brick wall called Reality. The international establishment elites have slammed the accelerator to the floor and they are heading towards it, apparently with their eyes closed. I don't like the idea of a load of terrible destructive crashes. I'd much rather they slowed down, opened their eyes, learned how to think, got out of the car, and walked towards the wall instead. Some hope, huh?
For those who read the Sunday Times, Matthew Syed was basically advising Labour that the fight is lost and they need to start taking action against illegal migration or suffer electoral annihilation (he didn't say the latter but it is there by implication).
His key point is "Are politicians like Mahmood so blind that they can’t see that if illegal migrants need such instructions [in the leaflets], it is rank betrayal of the British people not to instantly deport them?"
Do these guidelines include a clause that heads of households should not follow their dependents into voting booths to ensure they all vote Labour?
They're for new arrivals. You'd hope they don't have the vote.
Denmark published figures showing the disproportionately high crime rate for Afghans, Somalis etc. It is reasonable to assume that the Afghans etc imported to the UK are also disproportionately criminal. That is, the government needs to explain how the UK somehow got the law abiding Somalis etc only.
By not publishing data the government merely stops us knowing whether our data shows marginally higher or lower disproportion compared to Denmark, and the differences will be marginal and so irrelevant.
It’s for asylum seekers who the govt has to accept once here as they have a right to claim asylum. It is far more worrying that the last govt issued 1 million visas to people to come here without any concern about the beliefs or culture of their countries or their personal conduct. That was just after leaving the EU in order to “get control” of our borders. All of them able to bring in multiple family membets all of whom can vote and can stand for election as far as I understand it . We have an MSP in Scotland who is here only on a temporary student visa yet is in our parliament telling us what rape is and telling women to pipe down.
It's crimes against humanity this government need to be held to account ! They are taking away our rights to live in peace in a safe environment
I’d say the 70% of voters who won’t vote Reform or Restore ARE stupid Matt. And the 4% who insist on voting Restore are very stupid because they won’t vote for the party that could win an election and will give them 80% of what they want. The majority of British people are very stupid or happy seeing the country destroyed.
Agree with a lot there. I'd just add, millions of our own people who live in post industrial wastelands are on welfare and fear the Right will just take their benefits off them and offer no real solutions unfortunately.
If people don't hear a positive economic message or don't believe the Right can deliver on their strengths (Remigration, law and order ect) they will just vote for the candidate promising the most free stuff, unfortunately.
Is there anything that Reform could do to make the government publish crime statistics by nationality?
Is a humble address in parliament a possibility?
Spot on Matt! They must really think we are stupid. The fact is they are stupid: if they knew anything about human behaviour they would know that it is not changed by a booklet. The British culture and behaviours are rooted in Christian traditions, values and established in the rule of law and all this has evolved over many centuries. Sometimes we don’t value what we have until we start to see it being destroyed. The facilitation of mass migration over a relatively short period of time from vastly different cultures as well as illegal immigration is a threat to our way of life. Enough.
Unfortunately we will soon be the migrants and asylum seekers trying to flee England.
Surely even labour cannot be stupid enough to believe we cannot see the contradiction in this
Never underestimate the stupidity of the Labour party.....
It's part and parcel of their covert demoralisation of the people program.
Such pamphlets are not new. Sweden not only put out leaflets but ran classes for illegals on how to behave. Sweden is now clamping down on illegals and trying to get rid of them, an extraordinarily difficult task given they have no papers.
Anybody arriving here illegally must be interned upon arrival. A WW2 style prison camp would do the trick. We are morally obliged to shelter and feed them. Marquees, bunk beds and a diet of turnips and swedes does just that. There they stay until deportation or death, whichever comes first. Odds on it will be death.