Join Britain's fastest-growing independent political community which provides more than 90,000 readers with counter-cultural evidence, analysis, and debate that challenges the establishment.
Are we allowed to say that the cultural difference expressed in the Koran is at the root of all the problems? Why does no-one ever talk about what is being preached in mosques up and down the country? Where they say that everyone who is not a Muslim is an enemy? And that non-Muslims can be treated as slaves?
Do not bother to read the Koran. Just dip into the Hadith - the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad - which is the scariest book in print. Had it been by anyone else, it would be banned as 'hate literature'. It makes clear the true intentions of the Founder of Islam.
The strongest point here isn’t even the booklet itself, it’s the contradiction.
If the Government believes there’s genuinely nothing to see in the immigration/crime data, release the data and let the public judge for themselves.
You can’t simultaneously say “there’s no problem”, refuse to publish the evidence, and then issue guidance warning new arrivals not to rape, sexually assault, abuse or harass people.
Transparency would settle the argument. Why won’t they provide it?
They only have to hang on until they can wreck the economy beyond repair, destroy our country and our culture and fiddle the elections so that the faaaaaar right can never get power again. Then they hand us over to the WEF as controled and subservient peasants.
Agree that's the plan. It will only be British patriots that will stand in the way - that's why I fear there will be some sort of attack launched. You can see it coming.
Spot on, alternatively the dire situation will push the fearful and law abiding citizens into protest and revolt out of desperation, which could turn bad and this will enable them to enforce a form of police state and further censor and control the narrative to, of course, stop the far right and ' keep us safe'.
We are bring forced as law abiding tax payers to fund our demise and the destruction of our once safe and culturally civilised country.
I just wish we could organise and stop paying our taxes as individuals, as businesses (no VAT, no PAYE etc) and bring these useless cretins to heel. They work for US remember, we the people should have the right to remove them by whatever means possible.
What exactly is your point? To which "they" are you referring - the civil service? the governing party? all the political parties? the party leaders? or the People- where ultimate sovereignty resides.
That may well be the calculation. If there is no political cost to withholding the evidence, consistency and public trust become secondary. That is precisely why the pressure for publication has to continue.
What nonsense. Of course the uniparty can say there is no problem and refuse to release the data. In the same way, it can say, straightfaced, that a woman can have a penis. Come on, you have to get with the programme. Norfolk and Suffolk Constabulary is now issuing certain officers with male and female warrant cards so that their 'gender' is covered dependent upon mood.
Because of positive discrimination, we now have police officers who cannot decide if they are male or female on any given day. More to the point, the police are there to uphold the law. Except of course that of the Supreme Court which has ruled that one's gender is permanent and cannot be changed. Does that mean I can speed along the A12 if I am in a risk taking mood? It should do.
Of course they can do it. They plainly are doing it. My point is that they cannot do it credibly or without contradicting themselves.
They insist there is no problem, withhold the evidence that would allow the public to test that claim, and simultaneously issue guidance suggesting that there is a sufficiently serious cultural problem to require explicit warnings about rape, child sexual abuse and controlling women.
Your warrant-card example is another argument about institutional credibility, but it doesn’t alter my central point: publish the immigration and crime data and let the evidence decide the question.
I totally agree. Josef Goebbels once promoted the big lie. For a while, it was very successful. Eventually, though, people acknowledge the evidence in front of their eyes. If the uniparty lies often enough, which goodness knows it has over the years, people stop believing anything it says. For a long time now, if the government advises something, I do the exact opposite. The Covid jab is an excellent case in point.
The Covid jab has probably been the lie of the century Kevan. My father-in-law had an episode after the jab from which he never recovered. I also know of countless people who were injured or who have passed as a result of it. Sadly, very few are acknowledged in the data and that is only the data they will let us have access to.
Which is why I tend to ignore government advice. I refused the jab because it was rushed out in the first place and then the interval between jabs increased 8 fold, from 3 weeks to 6 months. The vaccine had barely been in existence that long, so could not possible have been properly tested.
Meanwhile, government was firing public employees refusing the jab. That is a gross abuse of public power. Equally, experiments with puberty blockers continue, despite them being outlawed. Dr Josef Mengele would be proud of us.
And the Labour Party published this on my wife, having no doubt fished somehow through Facebook posts going back 5 years where she simply stated this fact. Her personal Facebook is pretty heavily locked down as well. https://act.labour.org.uk/p/reform-revealed-dossier
She must have used her maiden name because I could not find her name on the list. The Liebour message is clear enough though. Some Reformers have said some pointlessly unpleasant things and should be censured. The vast majority simply tell it like it is, myself included. I stood in Fareham and Waterlooville in 2024.
I loathe the NHS, (I call it the ISS (international sickness service), run by foreigners, for the benefit of foreigners. It is time it was replaced, and British trained staff were brought in . Get shot of the nurses who cannot communicate with patients, and who do not understand our ways. If we had decent health provision I am sure people would pay (say £20 ) to see a properly qualified doctor.The NHS creates dependency, after WW2 I could understand why we needed it. However today because it is free (not really), but one doesn't pay "up front", it is abused, and people think it is a right to be treated. A better costed out system would deter foreigners abusing it.
Labour is not about transparency. It is about getting and clinging onto power/office, by whatever means. But the problem is not just Labour: 'bien pensant' Conservatives and LibDems are part of the problem, too.
The gaslighting is of a monumental scale; we all know the truth. There is not a day goes by without a media report of another white, British woman being subjected to a viscious attack by illegal immigrants, yet the Government still encourages these animals to come here. There is not a day goes by without another report of violence committed by immigrants, whether it be knifings, gang fights or other barbaric assaults, yet we are told that these people are doctors and engineers, but now the cat is out of the bag; by printing this leaflet the Government has admitted that illegal immigrants have unleashed a crime wave onto the British people.
What really angers me is the sentence that states that if an illegal immigrant carries out a rape, then it MAY lead to their asylum claim being refused! If ever there was a sentence designed to encourage attacks then this is it; our own Government telling these animals that when they carry out an assault, it might affect their right to stay in this country, when in fact it should state that they will be on the first plane out of here! We are governed by total traitors and Quislings, and the sooner we get ridnofnthenlot of them the better.
And why do we have to wait for them to commit a rape in the first place? By then a British woman, child or more recently man's life has been destroyed.
When you say not every illegal migrant is a criminal is missing the point. Every illegal migrant should be treated as a criminal and a sexual predator and the onus should be on them to prove otherwise. And that is a prerequisite before they are even considered for asylum. We don’t owe these people anything, we didn’t ask them to come and the majority don’t want them here. It is why the only real solution is detain, deport back to their own country or a third country. We all know sexual attacks are in the hundreds and increasing. The risk of giving any illegal migrant the benefit of doubt is now too great especially for females and children.
I don't want any more "asylum seekers" here. I remember back in the 1970s when it was great Soviet athletes or scientists or ballet dancers or double agents who defected while in the UK and who we then allowed to stay. They either had something big to offer this country or had put their lives on the line by betraying the Communist state. They were also few in number. The situation is totally different now and none of the men coming across in the dinghies or on the lorries need to be here. I would also like any foreign national, whoever they are and however they came to be here, who commits an imprisonable offence in this country to be deported.
For those who read the Sunday Times, Matthew Syed was basically advising Labour that the fight is lost and they need to start taking action against illegal migration or suffer electoral annihilation (he didn't say the latter but it is there by implication).
His key point is "Are politicians like Mahmood so blind that they can’t see that if illegal migrants need such instructions [in the leaflets], it is rank betrayal of the British people not to instantly deport them?"
Labour should be electorally wiped out, they are no longer the Labour Party of its inception, when they were formed to fight for and represent the workers and downtrodden of this country. They have been operating under this ruse for years now, gaslighting and deluding the masses: they are globalist. / totalitarian neo commies, who don't give a damn about the indigenous British people.
Problem is Commonwealth citizens automatically are allowed to vote, and Pakistan is one of those countries. I think the law should be changed. I also believe foreigners should not be in positions of power, whether, an MP, a mayor or in the government.
Denmark published figures showing the disproportionately high crime rate for Afghans, Somalis etc. It is reasonable to assume that the Afghans etc imported to the UK are also disproportionately criminal. That is, the government needs to explain how the UK somehow got the law abiding Somalis etc only.
By not publishing data the government merely stops us knowing whether our data shows marginally higher or lower disproportion compared to Denmark, and the differences will be marginal and so irrelevant.
The Government is going to court, at tax payers expense, to prevent the release of crime data by nationality for the last 4 years. We all know what the data will show.
It’s for asylum seekers who the govt has to accept once here as they have a right to claim asylum. It is far more worrying that the last govt issued 1 million visas to people to come here without any concern about the beliefs or culture of their countries or their personal conduct. That was just after leaving the EU in order to “get control” of our borders. All of them able to bring in multiple family membets all of whom can vote and can stand for election as far as I understand it . We have an MSP in Scotland who is here only on a temporary student visa yet is in our parliament telling us what rape is and telling women to pipe down.
There's this huge brick wall called Reality. The international establishment elites have slammed the accelerator to the floor and they are heading towards it, apparently with their eyes closed. I don't like the idea of a load of terrible destructive crashes. I'd much rather they slowed down, opened their eyes, learned how to think, got out of the car, and walked towards the wall instead. Some hope, huh?
I would like to give a shout-out here for the wonderfully brave Kellie-Jay Keen, whom is fearlessly standing up for women's rights and exposing the Islamist threat to the women of this country. Like Tommy Robinson, she does not present a pleasant image, and she certainly speaks her mind with honest brutality, but she has got the guts to speak out, unlike the majority of Leftist sycophants who know what is being perpetrated upon the women of this country but do not have the temerity to voice their disgust, for fear of being labelled 'racist'.
I’d say the 70% of voters who won’t vote Reform or Restore ARE stupid Matt. And the 4% who insist on voting Restore are very stupid because they won’t vote for the party that could win an election and will give them 80% of what they want. The majority of British people are very stupid or happy seeing the country destroyed.
Agree with a lot there. I'd just add, millions of our own people who live in post industrial wastelands are on welfare and fear the Right will just take their benefits off them and offer no real solutions unfortunately.
If people don't hear a positive economic message or don't believe the Right can deliver on their strengths (Remigration, law and order ect) they will just vote for the candidate promising the most free stuff, unfortunately.
Yes. This was warned about back in the time of the Ancient Greeks - they knew then that you cannot allow people who are benefiting from the pubic purse to vote.
Rupert Lowe uses his full allocation of Parliamentary Questions - far more than any other MP. He also has an online FOI service. Add your question and his team will help you improve the wording to maximise your chances of getting a reply. You can do this anonymously if you wish, as he realises you may be a whistle blower.
Such pamphlets are not new. Sweden not only put out leaflets but ran classes for illegals on how to behave. Sweden is now clamping down on illegals and trying to get rid of them, an extraordinarily difficult task given they have no papers.
Anybody arriving here illegally must be interned upon arrival. A WW2 style prison camp would do the trick. We are morally obliged to shelter and feed them. Marquees, bunk beds and a diet of turnips and swedes does just that. There they stay until deportation or death, whichever comes first. Odds on it will be death.
We should intern them here. WW2 style prison camps and feed them swedes and turnips. If they break in, they will NEVER be granted permission to enter the UK in any guise. They either prove where they are from and get returned there or die in internment.
Spot on Matt! They must really think we are stupid. The fact is they are stupid: if they knew anything about human behaviour they would know that it is not changed by a booklet. The British culture and behaviours are rooted in Christian traditions, values and established in the rule of law and all this has evolved over many centuries. Sometimes we don’t value what we have until we start to see it being destroyed. The facilitation of mass migration over a relatively short period of time from vastly different cultures as well as illegal immigration is a threat to our way of life. Enough.
Everyone knows what needs to be done, but we have a bunch of Emperor's New Clothes leaders stuck in place who it seems would rather die than admit the truth.
Are we allowed to say that the cultural difference expressed in the Koran is at the root of all the problems? Why does no-one ever talk about what is being preached in mosques up and down the country? Where they say that everyone who is not a Muslim is an enemy? And that non-Muslims can be treated as slaves?
Do not bother to read the Koran. Just dip into the Hadith - the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad - which is the scariest book in print. Had it been by anyone else, it would be banned as 'hate literature'. It makes clear the true intentions of the Founder of Islam.
They just lie. They know no one will actually read it.
The hallowed practices of taqiyya and kitman encourage lying (esp to infidels) when ‘protecting the faith’…..
The strongest point here isn’t even the booklet itself, it’s the contradiction.
If the Government believes there’s genuinely nothing to see in the immigration/crime data, release the data and let the public judge for themselves.
You can’t simultaneously say “there’s no problem”, refuse to publish the evidence, and then issue guidance warning new arrivals not to rape, sexually assault, abuse or harass people.
Transparency would settle the argument. Why won’t they provide it?
They know their argument makes zero sense, they just don't care. It's all about clinging to power with any dirty trick they can now.
They only have to hang on until they can wreck the economy beyond repair, destroy our country and our culture and fiddle the elections so that the faaaaaar right can never get power again. Then they hand us over to the WEF as controled and subservient peasants.
Agree that's the plan. It will only be British patriots that will stand in the way - that's why I fear there will be some sort of attack launched. You can see it coming.
Spot on, alternatively the dire situation will push the fearful and law abiding citizens into protest and revolt out of desperation, which could turn bad and this will enable them to enforce a form of police state and further censor and control the narrative to, of course, stop the far right and ' keep us safe'.
We are bring forced as law abiding tax payers to fund our demise and the destruction of our once safe and culturally civilised country.
I just wish we could organise and stop paying our taxes as individuals, as businesses (no VAT, no PAYE etc) and bring these useless cretins to heel. They work for US remember, we the people should have the right to remove them by whatever means possible.
Referenda needed?
Not nearly strong enough to sort out our problems!
Look how they dealt with the
The last referendum that is
What exactly is your point? To which "they" are you referring - the civil service? the governing party? all the political parties? the party leaders? or the People- where ultimate sovereignty resides.
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable” — John F. Kennedy.
That may well be the calculation. If there is no political cost to withholding the evidence, consistency and public trust become secondary. That is precisely why the pressure for publication has to continue.
What nonsense. Of course the uniparty can say there is no problem and refuse to release the data. In the same way, it can say, straightfaced, that a woman can have a penis. Come on, you have to get with the programme. Norfolk and Suffolk Constabulary is now issuing certain officers with male and female warrant cards so that their 'gender' is covered dependent upon mood.
Because of positive discrimination, we now have police officers who cannot decide if they are male or female on any given day. More to the point, the police are there to uphold the law. Except of course that of the Supreme Court which has ruled that one's gender is permanent and cannot be changed. Does that mean I can speed along the A12 if I am in a risk taking mood? It should do.
Of course they can do it. They plainly are doing it. My point is that they cannot do it credibly or without contradicting themselves.
They insist there is no problem, withhold the evidence that would allow the public to test that claim, and simultaneously issue guidance suggesting that there is a sufficiently serious cultural problem to require explicit warnings about rape, child sexual abuse and controlling women.
Your warrant-card example is another argument about institutional credibility, but it doesn’t alter my central point: publish the immigration and crime data and let the evidence decide the question.
I totally agree. Josef Goebbels once promoted the big lie. For a while, it was very successful. Eventually, though, people acknowledge the evidence in front of their eyes. If the uniparty lies often enough, which goodness knows it has over the years, people stop believing anything it says. For a long time now, if the government advises something, I do the exact opposite. The Covid jab is an excellent case in point.
The Covid jab has probably been the lie of the century Kevan. My father-in-law had an episode after the jab from which he never recovered. I also know of countless people who were injured or who have passed as a result of it. Sadly, very few are acknowledged in the data and that is only the data they will let us have access to.
Which is why I tend to ignore government advice. I refused the jab because it was rushed out in the first place and then the interval between jabs increased 8 fold, from 3 weeks to 6 months. The vaccine had barely been in existence that long, so could not possible have been properly tested.
Meanwhile, government was firing public employees refusing the jab. That is a gross abuse of public power. Equally, experiments with puberty blockers continue, despite them being outlawed. Dr Josef Mengele would be proud of us.
And the Labour Party published this on my wife, having no doubt fished somehow through Facebook posts going back 5 years where she simply stated this fact. Her personal Facebook is pretty heavily locked down as well. https://act.labour.org.uk/p/reform-revealed-dossier
She must have used her maiden name because I could not find her name on the list. The Liebour message is clear enough though. Some Reformers have said some pointlessly unpleasant things and should be censured. The vast majority simply tell it like it is, myself included. I stood in Fareham and Waterlooville in 2024.
Elizabeth Clark top right
Everything she said is spot on. The NHS is awful, full of waste and incompetence.
I loathe the NHS, (I call it the ISS (international sickness service), run by foreigners, for the benefit of foreigners. It is time it was replaced, and British trained staff were brought in . Get shot of the nurses who cannot communicate with patients, and who do not understand our ways. If we had decent health provision I am sure people would pay (say £20 ) to see a properly qualified doctor.The NHS creates dependency, after WW2 I could understand why we needed it. However today because it is free (not really), but one doesn't pay "up front", it is abused, and people think it is a right to be treated. A better costed out system would deter foreigners abusing it.
They all seem to have adequate backgrounds to me……😉
Two warrant cards?! Hadn't heard that one before. 🙄👍
Labour is not about transparency. It is about getting and clinging onto power/office, by whatever means. But the problem is not just Labour: 'bien pensant' Conservatives and LibDems are part of the problem, too.
They won't provide the data because they know it would be absolutely damning, and then they wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
The gaslighting is of a monumental scale; we all know the truth. There is not a day goes by without a media report of another white, British woman being subjected to a viscious attack by illegal immigrants, yet the Government still encourages these animals to come here. There is not a day goes by without another report of violence committed by immigrants, whether it be knifings, gang fights or other barbaric assaults, yet we are told that these people are doctors and engineers, but now the cat is out of the bag; by printing this leaflet the Government has admitted that illegal immigrants have unleashed a crime wave onto the British people.
What really angers me is the sentence that states that if an illegal immigrant carries out a rape, then it MAY lead to their asylum claim being refused! If ever there was a sentence designed to encourage attacks then this is it; our own Government telling these animals that when they carry out an assault, it might affect their right to stay in this country, when in fact it should state that they will be on the first plane out of here! We are governed by total traitors and Quislings, and the sooner we get ridnofnthenlot of them the better.
And why do we have to wait for them to commit a rape in the first place? By then a British woman, child or more recently man's life has been destroyed.
Because we are being run by a load of ignorant "lefties", who are determined to destroy our country, and achieve their goal of replacement.
I agree we are now into treason territory.
The stand should be zero tolerance, nothing else will stand a chance of deterring such barbaric attacks.
When you say not every illegal migrant is a criminal is missing the point. Every illegal migrant should be treated as a criminal and a sexual predator and the onus should be on them to prove otherwise. And that is a prerequisite before they are even considered for asylum. We don’t owe these people anything, we didn’t ask them to come and the majority don’t want them here. It is why the only real solution is detain, deport back to their own country or a third country. We all know sexual attacks are in the hundreds and increasing. The risk of giving any illegal migrant the benefit of doubt is now too great especially for females and children.
This is of course how a sane nation would behave.
I don't want any more "asylum seekers" here. I remember back in the 1970s when it was great Soviet athletes or scientists or ballet dancers or double agents who defected while in the UK and who we then allowed to stay. They either had something big to offer this country or had put their lives on the line by betraying the Communist state. They were also few in number. The situation is totally different now and none of the men coming across in the dinghies or on the lorries need to be here. I would also like any foreign national, whoever they are and however they came to be here, who commits an imprisonable offence in this country to be deported.
For those who read the Sunday Times, Matthew Syed was basically advising Labour that the fight is lost and they need to start taking action against illegal migration or suffer electoral annihilation (he didn't say the latter but it is there by implication).
His key point is "Are politicians like Mahmood so blind that they can’t see that if illegal migrants need such instructions [in the leaflets], it is rank betrayal of the British people not to instantly deport them?"
Labour should be electorally wiped out, they are no longer the Labour Party of its inception, when they were formed to fight for and represent the workers and downtrodden of this country. They have been operating under this ruse for years now, gaslighting and deluding the masses: they are globalist. / totalitarian neo commies, who don't give a damn about the indigenous British people.
Yes but never underestimate the welfare vote "voting for Reform will cut your welfare" and the muslim bloc vote.
Labour and Burnham are very dangerous opponents.
Yes, i agree, and many people don't have the time or inclination to think through the implications beyond the scare tactics, they vote reactively.
There are huge numbers of people on welfare and they vote
Do these guidelines include a clause that heads of households should not follow their dependents into voting booths to ensure they all vote Labour?
They're for new arrivals. You'd hope they don't have the vote.
Problem is Commonwealth citizens automatically are allowed to vote, and Pakistan is one of those countries. I think the law should be changed. I also believe foreigners should not be in positions of power, whether, an MP, a mayor or in the government.
Denmark published figures showing the disproportionately high crime rate for Afghans, Somalis etc. It is reasonable to assume that the Afghans etc imported to the UK are also disproportionately criminal. That is, the government needs to explain how the UK somehow got the law abiding Somalis etc only.
By not publishing data the government merely stops us knowing whether our data shows marginally higher or lower disproportion compared to Denmark, and the differences will be marginal and so irrelevant.
The Government is going to court, at tax payers expense, to prevent the release of crime data by nationality for the last 4 years. We all know what the data will show.
It's crimes against humanity this government need to be held to account ! They are taking away our rights to live in peace in a safe environment
It’s for asylum seekers who the govt has to accept once here as they have a right to claim asylum. It is far more worrying that the last govt issued 1 million visas to people to come here without any concern about the beliefs or culture of their countries or their personal conduct. That was just after leaving the EU in order to “get control” of our borders. All of them able to bring in multiple family membets all of whom can vote and can stand for election as far as I understand it . We have an MSP in Scotland who is here only on a temporary student visa yet is in our parliament telling us what rape is and telling women to pipe down.
There's this huge brick wall called Reality. The international establishment elites have slammed the accelerator to the floor and they are heading towards it, apparently with their eyes closed. I don't like the idea of a load of terrible destructive crashes. I'd much rather they slowed down, opened their eyes, learned how to think, got out of the car, and walked towards the wall instead. Some hope, huh?
I would like to give a shout-out here for the wonderfully brave Kellie-Jay Keen, whom is fearlessly standing up for women's rights and exposing the Islamist threat to the women of this country. Like Tommy Robinson, she does not present a pleasant image, and she certainly speaks her mind with honest brutality, but she has got the guts to speak out, unlike the majority of Leftist sycophants who know what is being perpetrated upon the women of this country but do not have the temerity to voice their disgust, for fear of being labelled 'racist'.
I’d say the 70% of voters who won’t vote Reform or Restore ARE stupid Matt. And the 4% who insist on voting Restore are very stupid because they won’t vote for the party that could win an election and will give them 80% of what they want. The majority of British people are very stupid or happy seeing the country destroyed.
Agree with a lot there. I'd just add, millions of our own people who live in post industrial wastelands are on welfare and fear the Right will just take their benefits off them and offer no real solutions unfortunately.
If people don't hear a positive economic message or don't believe the Right can deliver on their strengths (Remigration, law and order ect) they will just vote for the candidate promising the most free stuff, unfortunately.
Yes. This was warned about back in the time of the Ancient Greeks - they knew then that you cannot allow people who are benefiting from the pubic purse to vote.
Why worry about Restore while there is no General Election in sight? They seem to be doing a decent job of tugging Reform rightwards.
Interesting perspective. Reform have definitely tacked right on deportations to the point where they’re advocating going further than Restore.
Rupert Lowe uses his full allocation of Parliamentary Questions - far more than any other MP. He also has an online FOI service. Add your question and his team will help you improve the wording to maximise your chances of getting a reply. You can do this anonymously if you wish, as he realises you may be a whistle blower.
Such pamphlets are not new. Sweden not only put out leaflets but ran classes for illegals on how to behave. Sweden is now clamping down on illegals and trying to get rid of them, an extraordinarily difficult task given they have no papers.
Anybody arriving here illegally must be interned upon arrival. A WW2 style prison camp would do the trick. We are morally obliged to shelter and feed them. Marquees, bunk beds and a diet of turnips and swedes does just that. There they stay until deportation or death, whichever comes first. Odds on it will be death.
Those who refuse to say where they were born should be deported to a third country such as Rwanda.
We should intern them here. WW2 style prison camps and feed them swedes and turnips. If they break in, they will NEVER be granted permission to enter the UK in any guise. They either prove where they are from and get returned there or die in internment.
Spot on Matt! They must really think we are stupid. The fact is they are stupid: if they knew anything about human behaviour they would know that it is not changed by a booklet. The British culture and behaviours are rooted in Christian traditions, values and established in the rule of law and all this has evolved over many centuries. Sometimes we don’t value what we have until we start to see it being destroyed. The facilitation of mass migration over a relatively short period of time from vastly different cultures as well as illegal immigration is a threat to our way of life. Enough.
Everyone knows what needs to be done, but we have a bunch of Emperor's New Clothes leaders stuck in place who it seems would rather die than admit the truth.
Unfortunately we will soon be the migrants and asylum seekers trying to flee England.